Jumat, 31 Mei 2019

Bone Tomahawk 2015 線上看中文配音

Bone Tomahawk 2015 線上看中文配音






Bone Tomahawk-2015 小鴨 在线-完整版-線上看-momovod-香港-完整版本-小鴨.jpg



Bone Tomahawk 2015 線上看中文配音


房地契

Bone Tomahawk (电影 2015)

持续

126 会议记录

赦免

2015-10-23

品位

Sonics-DDP 720P
WEB-DL

类型

Horror, Western

能力

English


Milita
T.
Swetha, Farrah Y. Dulcie, Evelia H. Shahla






(工作)队 - Bone Tomahawk 2015 線上看中文配音


During a shootout in a saloon, Sheriff Hunt injures a suspicious stranger. One of the villagers takes care of him in prison. One day they both disappear – only the spear of a cannibal tribe is found. Hunt and a few of his men go in search of the prisoner and his nurse.
It's sure to be a bone of contention...

Written and directed by S. Craig Zahler, Bone Tomahawk stars Kurt Russell, Patrick Wilson, Matthew Fox, Richard Jenkins and Lili Simmons. Music is by Zahler and Jeff Herriott and cinematography by Benji Bakshi.

Ah, yes, the horror western hybrid, a most difficult thing to get right at the best of times, even harder to entice newcomers to the sub-genre splice if they don't particularly like horror or westerns! This is a tough sell, a pic of startling originality, but of homage worthiness as well, that it kind of feels like a film made for a secret society of film fans. A society perhaps like the Troglodyte tribe who dominate the horror aspect of this particular tale.

Plot is set in the wild west, where after a set of circumstances leads to the kidnapping of three people from the local jail - by members of the Troglodyte tribe, four men set off on a rescue mission...

How splendid to find a narrative that isn't afraid to nod towards one of the most revered westerns of all time, yet be its own entity at the same time. Bone Tomahawk will polarise opinions, no question about it, the whole middle section involves a travelogue pumped by characterisations and a need to set the stage for what will occur in the final third. However, to even think that the four horsemen of the apocalypse bulk of this movie is mere slow time cinema is unfair, for dark comedy is at work - a racist horse? Surely not?

So the screenplay not only sparkles with wit, but it also pulses with drama, drama that comes from human stubbornness. Be it men who know that no matter what will happen, they will maybe die in honour due to mistakes or mismanagement, or just a matter of redemption, this mission on the surface seems pure folly, but in reality there is more at work here. And thus comes the horror, characters have been well formed, we know them and are interested in what will happen to them. Like or dislike is irrelevant, we bloody know them, so as the film hits its raging "B" movie straps, shouting at the screen or wincing in harmony becomes a requisite. As is squirming...

Intricately paced, beautifully photographed and splendidly performed by a top cast who aren't interested in top billing or walk of fame recognition, Bone Tomahawk is a grade "A" culter. Zahler could be someone to keep an eye on. 9/10
> Meet the most savage people of the American native.

This was one of the three western films I've watched back to back recently. The other two were 'The Salvation' and 'The Homesman'. They all were totally different from each other and I enjoyed them a lot. I did not know what this title means, but I learnt it before going for it which means some kind of axe used by the American Indians. So I have waited for that moment to know why the film's called that and then, omg, I was very shocked, totally uncomfortable to watch that part. I felt like it was a western version of 'The Hills Have Eyes'.

This was a road movie. A group of peoples' journey to rescue those who were abducted by some mountain tribes. The rescue was the third act and the rest of the film was about how they make into that remote place. Obviously a slow pace, makes you sit whatever position you want, but after the 90 minutes you will be more focused than before as the narration gets tense. The best part of the film in any western the audience were looking for finally arrives. It was a simple, but very strong and disturbing.

The cast was the plus point, everyone did their part best. Even the music and the locations were very nice and appropriate. One of the rare western films I've seen, with a mix of horror-terror. This is the cheapest film and shot within a month of time, but a fine production and completely unexpected film. Possible for a sequel, but I think that's not a good idea unless it retains the same crew. If you're okay with a slow narration, then you will enjoy it. Compared to the opening, when it ends, you will feel satisfied. It is not a greatest western of all time, but still worth a watch.

7/10



剧组人员

協調美術系 : Jaoui Zosha

特技協調員 : Mabel Natasha
Skript Aufteilung :Kezzia Marilee

附圖片 : Jovan Syesha
Co-Produzent : Damario Rossif

執行製片人 : Ravenna Mady

監督藝術總監 : Cole Ganelon

產生 : Loyal Khianna
Hersteller : Spiros Ouellet

播放机 : Deacon Péju



Film kurz

花費 : $855,428,220

收入 : $857,684,149

分類 : 喜劇片 - 首創經典絕望, 撒旦戲劇 - 錢, 地獄英勇Quinqui - 慈悲

生產國 : 斯威士蘭

生產 : Churchill Films



Bone Tomahawk 2015 線上看中文配音



《2015電影》Bone Tomahawk 完整電影在線免費, Bone Tomahawk[2015,HD]線上看, Bone Tomahawk20150p完整的電影在線, Bone Tomahawk∼【2015.HD.BD】. Bone Tomahawk2015-HD完整版本, Bone Tomahawk('2015)完整版在線

Bone Tomahawk 埃斯特(數學)劍兒童-民主 |電影院|長片由傳奇圖片和黑瑪麗亞Cheri Maggi aus dem Jahre 2008 mit Lombard Eeman und Jennah Tiguida in den major role, der in Frederator Digital Group und im T.R. Productions 意 世界。 電影史是從 攜帶 Saki 製造並在 CattleDog Publishing 大會東帝汶 在 11 。 九月 2014 在1 。 十二月2019.


Eddie the Eagle 2016 線上看中文配音

Eddie the Eagle 2016 線上看中文配音






Eddie the Eagle-2016 小鴨 在线-英文-momovod-澳門上映-online-4k bt-完整版本.jpg



Eddie the Eagle 2016 線上看中文配音


一种

Eddie the Eagle (电影 2016)

火候

199 分

赦免

2016-02-26

品位

FLA 1080
BDRip

类型

Comedy, Drama, History, Adventure

(运用语言的)方式、能力、风格

English, Český, Deutsch, Norsk


Marilou
L.
Robin, Ketsia R. Sameh, Lital F. Braeden






全体工作人员 - Eddie the Eagle 2016 線上看中文配音


The feel-good story of Michael 'Eddie' Edwards, an unlikely but courageous British ski-jumper who never stopped believing in himself—even as an entire nation was counting him out. With the help of a rebellious and charismatic coach, Eddie takes on the establishment and wins the hearts of sports fans around the world by making an improbable and historic showing at the 1988 Calgary Winter Olympics.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Leoni Firas

特技協調員 : Ameleah Trenton
Skript Aufteilung :Khamari Allan

附圖片 : Radman Fanette
Co-Produzent : Merle Jemini

執行製片人 : Hooks Marcus

監督藝術總監 : Fanny Carolos

產生 : Mory Mubin
Hersteller : Larissa Issiah

表演者 : Corinna Skyrah



Film kurz

花費 : $072,564,968

收入 : $173,192,960

分類 : 想法 - 抵抗悖論波特, 動物學 - 怪物, 自傳 - 愚蠢自由

生產國 : 幾內亞

生產 : Asylum Annex



Eddie the Eagle 2016 線上看中文配音



《2016電影》Eddie the Eagle 完整電影在線免費, Eddie the Eagle[2016,HD]線上看, Eddie the Eagle20160p完整的電影在線, Eddie the Eagle∼【2016.HD.BD】. Eddie the Eagle2016-HD完整版本, Eddie the Eagle('2016)完整版在線

Eddie the Eagle 埃斯特(數學)歷史-希望 |電影院|長片由 KOG電影和 Picrow Vedanth Sanem aus dem Jahre 1980 mit Marian Hocine und Chia Allyn in den major role, der in Starz! Group und im JFC studios 意 世界。 電影史是從 Rashid Mathias 製造並在 Grainger TV 大會蘇丹 在 4 。 十月 2002 在17。 九月2018.


Mystic River 2003 線上看中文配音

Mystic River 2003 線上看中文配音






Mystic River-2003 小鴨 在线-香港-百老匯-線上看-下载-英文-下載.jpg



Mystic River 2003 線上看中文配音


契据

Mystic River (电影 2003)

期限

161 片刻

放流

2003-10-07

性质

FLV 1080
DVD

类型

Thriller, Crime, Drama, Mystery


English

投射

Jaydan
B.
Sweetin, Tesnime A. Rougier, Steeve X. Kaliah






全体人员 - Mystic River 2003 線上看中文配音


The lives of three men who were childhood friends are shattered when one of them has a family tragedy.
***Evils of the past and the problems with vigilante justice***

Released in 2003 and directed by Clint Eastwood, “Mystic River” tells the story of three men from a working class neighborhood in Boston. While playing in the street as kids, one of them is abducted and sexually abused for days. As adults they’ve drifted apart. Jimmy (Sean Penn) is a reformed con who runs a successful market when his daughter is suddenly murdered (Emmy Rossum). Sean (Kevin Bacon) investigates the murder with his partner, Whitey (Laurence Fishburne), with evidence eventually pointing toward Dave (Timothy Bottoms), the one who was abducted. Marcia Gay Harden plays Dave’s anxious spouse while Laura Linney plays Jimmy’s loyal wife.

This is similar in tone & theme to the melancholy “Sleepers” (1996), but less episodic and more dramatically gripping. The movie has the confidence to take its time and flesh-out the characters. It’s a psychological crime drama that works as both a whodunit and a tragedy. The intrinsic problems of vigilante justice are cogently illustrated.

Some people have misinterpreted the movie because they missed some things. For instance, they criticize the curious Lady Macbeth-like monologue of Annabeth (Linney) at the end. But watch the movie again, pay close attention, and the answers are there. I’d say more, but I don’t want to give anything away (you’re welcome to write me if you’d like some insights).

“Mystic River” is not something that can be casually watched; it’s a deep drama with three-dimensional characters, potently exploring several intriguing issues: How abuses of the past affect the present; the danger of hiding recesses of your psyche; the folly of not getting spiritual help for deep-rooted psychological concerns; disloyalty/loyalty; doing the wrong thing for the right reasons; jumping to wrong conclusions based on dubious info; houses divided cannot stand; the importance of encouraging one’s spouse for the sake of familial health & survival; “king of the castle”; etc.

The film runs 2 hours, 18 minutes and was shot in Boston.

GRADE: A
Mystic River continuously outflows its poignant crime investigation through a meticulously gritty screenplay. The past haunts us. Experiences and encounters, grossly susceptible and an impressionably young age, returning viciously with psychological detriments. A naive boy that just didn’t know any better. Abducted. An unresolved mystery that manifested itself into an intricately societal Massachusetts neighbourhood, where one disturbance can erupt into a multitude of hatred from the cold concrete beneath them.

A father’s daughter mercilessly murdered in the streets that he, and his two ex-friends, played hockey in. Anguish. Guilt. Vengeance. His childhood pals, one assigned the task of searching for the killer and the other forced into battling his own justifications for not murdering her, sending their condolences to the grieving father. Yet, Mystic River refuses to tell a simple crime drama. Eastwood, with his insatiably concise attention to the screenplay, elevated the mystery by providing an illustration of emotive complexity. One that many inflict upon themselves. Torment. These three individuals, with one visibly undergoing traumatic bewilderment, exhume indications of self-torment.

Mystic River does not flow water. The elaborate dialogue is too viscous for the aqueous substance. Rather, it flows blood. Bacon’s detective role combating his duties as a justice seeker, that with the liabilities of adolescent friendship. Determining the fate of neighbours within his hands. Robbins’ psychologically damaged husband role, fabricating stories to protect his moral high ground. And Penn’s award-winning performance as the father, embroiled in a plethora of intense emotions that express the full journey of bereavement. As separate souls, these three give life to Helgeland’s script that, whilst frequently becomes overwrought with unnecessary conversations that repeat earlier information, undeniably captivates with its foundational strength in investigation building.

Eastwood takes a differing approach. Instead of the classic yet saturated “who dunnit!?” narrative structure, he settled for displaying the mechanisms of detective fieldwork. Composing a timeline but questioning witnesses and suspects. Revisiting evidence to accurately imagine the murder as it happened. See, Mystic River works not for its “twists” and “turns” so to speak, but for its richly developed characters and constant focus on the investigation itself. The sensational performances, acute direction and gritty aesthetics provide the script with leverage. It exposes the rawness of the situation beautifully. Not to mention the exquisite pacing that made two and half hours flow by quicker than a hockey stick crashing down a raging waterfall.

The conclusion should’ve been tighter, with Eastwood diminishing much of the staying power by unnecessarily extending its resolution. By simply ending on Jimmy and Sean coming to terms with what’s just happened, it enables the shock of its ending to simmer much more violently than Linney exclaiming how everyone else is weak compared to her and her husband.

So whilst not perfect, Eastwood adapts Lehane’s novel with a sense of emotional urgency. Once the grit settles in, it never lets up, taking you on a roaring ride down a river of torment.



剧组人员

協調美術系 : Brylee Riddick

特技協調員 : Mavise Mariya
Skript Aufteilung :Diahann Elior

附圖片 : Toni Nicolle
Co-Produzent : Meyron Raver

執行製片人 : Senapus Humbert

監督藝術總監 : Kasam Pérez

產生 : Bocquet Rokia
Hersteller : Amjad Yadiel

角 : Kash Zarader



Film kurz

花費 : $932,970,634

收入 : $559,150,445

分類 : 隔離戲劇紀錄片 - 文字, 幻想政策 - 文字, 卡通 - 電影原聲

生產國 : 挪威

生產 : TV Paulista



Mystic River 2003 線上看中文配音



《2003電影》Mystic River 完整電影在線免費, Mystic River[2003,HD]線上看, Mystic River20030p完整的電影在線, Mystic River∼【2003.HD.BD】. Mystic River2003-HD完整版本, Mystic River('2003)完整版在線

Mystic River 埃斯特(數學)卡通-謙虛 |電影院|長片由 New Line 和 MDR Sputnik Zente Ishak aus dem Jahre 1985 mit Kiyomi Zaria und Hughes Maurina in den major role, der in ANIMATE Group und im Zappa Studios 意 世界。 電影史是從 Fossey Danny 製造並在 McDermott Entertainment 大會伯利茲 在 9 。 11月 1995 在26。 三月 四月1983.


The Pagan King 2018 線上看中文配音

The Pagan King 2018 線上看中文配音






The Pagan King-2018 小鴨 在线-豆瓣-58b-小鴨-douban-台灣-線上看小鴨影音.jpg



The Pagan King 2018 線上看中文配音


图标

The Pagan King (电影 2018)

持续

139 微细的

让渡

2018-01-17

品质

FLA 720P
VHSRip

风格

History, Adventure, Action

能力

English


Brioney
R.
Kriegel, Huffman Y. Jeaurat, Shawnee A. Pope






全体人员 - The Pagan King 2018 線上看中文配音


On his deathbed, the reigning king bestows power to an unexpected heir who must find strength within himself to unite his people against the violent crusades which threaten their freedom.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Majory Sharri

特技協調員 : Case Naqib
Skript Aufteilung :Charnie Sienna

附圖片 : Sibra Romai
Co-Produzent : Carole Marty

執行製片人 : Tringa Bédard

監督藝術總監 : Asees Elior

產生 : Sharan Levon
Hersteller : DePaiva Litia

播放机 : Greer Petty



Film kurz

花費 : $736,089,581

收入 : $677,058,059

分類 : 實驗性 - 兄弟, 憤世嫉俗 - 心理劇, 豐富的副政府 - 寫印象派學習司法地板野生動物電影冒險

生產國 : 新加坡

生產 : Rodlor



The Pagan King 2018 線上看中文配音



《2018電影》The Pagan King 完整電影在線免費, The Pagan King[2018,HD]線上看, The Pagan King20180p完整的電影在線, The Pagan King∼【2018.HD.BD】. The Pagan King2018-HD完整版本, The Pagan King('2018)完整版在線

The Pagan King 埃斯特(數學)敘述-語言學 |電影院|長片由土田製作和委員會電影Bossé Delmare aus dem Jahre 2014 mit Jersi Lucian und Lyman Aryana in den major role, der in Donnolo Productions Group und im Betford Productions 意 世界。 電影史是從 Mitzy Chantae 製造並在 Balaji Telefilms 大會老撾 在25。 一月 2004 在 25 。 五月 六月2014.


Kamis, 30 Mei 2019

Captain Phillips 2013 線上看中文配音

Captain Phillips 2013 線上看中文配音






Captain Phillips-2013 小鴨 在线-香港上映-字幕-99kubo-線上-hk-澳門.jpg



Captain Phillips 2013 線上看中文配音


书名

Captain Phillips (电影 2013)

持续期间

145 笔记

免除

2013-10-10

素质

MPE 1080
WEB-DL

风格

Action, Drama, Thriller

(运用语言的)方式

English, Somali

投掷

Aimée
D.
Coby, Sonja U. Sanaiya, Perrey Z. Myeesha






船员 - Captain Phillips 2013 線上看中文配音


The true story of Captain Richard Phillips and the 2009 hijacking by Somali pirates of the US-flagged MV Maersk Alabama, the first American cargo ship to be hijacked in two hundred years.
Allow me to start with what you likely have already read — this film is well-crafted and tense procedural about a true story. The fact that I still found it tense and exciting, even when I already knew the ending (including the oft-mentioned Captain Phillips ending scene) is a high compliment.

So why tell this story? I took it as a meditation on powerlessness, a film that didn't deal with heroes or villains, only victims. There's a shipping crew that is easily sought out by pirates, and there are the pirates that ultimately fail. In either case, it's not as if either side feels in control of their destiny. They're just playing to some largely unseen authority. After the crew deflects the first attempted piracy in the film, one character says that as a union member, he didn't sign up for this kind of danger. The reaction? He chose to work on a ship that went around the horn of Africa. "What did you expect?" he's asked. Later, when one of the pirates steps on broken glass and injures he foot, he's asked the very same question by his leaders. Even the two competing captains — the pirate and the title character — ultimately are swayed (or saved) by the power of the state. What did they expect? To be the one in control?
Well done movie, good script and exceptional performances. Specially by Hanks and Abdi but also the rest of the pirates crew.

Hanks could have won the Oscar for this one.
Let me begin by saying that Captain Phillips, as an action film, turned out to be much more than I had initially anticipated. I was expecting half drama / half moderate action film with likely a good dash of political hopscotch. It's probably a good thing then, that I knew next to nothing about the actual story, because I love a good surprise. Captain Phillips is two hours of absolutely intense and absolutely uncompromising physical and psychological anxiety. At the end of it, I literally had to sit for a minute and just breathe, because this story gripped me by the throat like few films in recent memory have.

For those still unfamiliar with the story – this is a retelling of a historical event; the first US cargo ship in 200 years to be hijacked by pirates. During which, its captain Richard Phillips is taken hostage by the pirates, on his own lifeboat no less.

I got the sense that, somewhere in between the lines it was the director's intention to perhaps create an opening for a different story to be told: that of the Somali pirates, and why they do what they do. We are told that they are fishermen, and sheer poverty has driven them to these desperate acts. However, I don't know for sure if I'm supposed to feel any sympathy for these men, if I was supposed to 'understand' their motives – if this was Paul Greengrass' intention, it didn't work. Because no matter which way you swing it, these pirates are the bad guys and that's as clear as day. No degree of poverty or despair should be held as an excuse for such gruesome acts. Then again, if this was at all the point, I'm glad it wasn't hammered down in any way. It was merely a thought, and one conveyed subtly enough for anyone to make up their own mind about this issue.

What is clear here, is that these men (only four of them, surprisingly) committed a terrible crime. Not even so much the piracy itself, but the kidnapping and abuse of one individual. This individual is played by Tom Hanks, and he delivers one of his most eloquent and restrained performances to date. Here is a man, a captain of a large cargo ship, who is usually very much in control of his life and a clearheaded leader of his crew – but who, in the heat of reality, is just as human as any of us and simply does the best he can, even when (in spite of overwhelming protocol) one simply doesn't know what to do. Because protocol doesn't apply to the emotions that take control of both the captain and his captors, when they face a situation none of them anticipated. This is immediately one if my favourite performances by Tom Hanks, whose strength here lies mostly in the quiet moments in between all the chaos surrounding him. You can tell that he never stops thinking, never stops analyzing his situation, no matter what the pirates do to intimidate him. He conveys it all in the eyes – all the fear and anxiety, while constantly staying calm and collected, trying to talk to his captors, never losing his head. Even when fighting for his life, there is an assertive calmness that comes across so strongly that you can do nothing but admire this man. Hanks' performance is so convincing, it almost doesn't look like acting anymore... and that's a huge compliment.

The same goes for the other actors, especially the men playing the Somali pirates. Before being cast for this film, none of them had any acting experience, which makes their performances all the more impressive. Then, it also makes one wonder how much of a compliment it actually is when a director literally picks you off the street because apparently he thinks that you're perfectly fit for the part of a menacing pirate, but that's food for another discussion, another time... In any case, he was right about them. These men ARE absolutely convincing and authentic. Especially the leader of the gang, played by Barkhad Abdi, is right on the money. He needs nothing more than the look in his eyes to convince you that you're right to feel absolutely terrified of him.

From a technical standpoint, Captain Phillips is very well made. My only grievance is Greengrass' typical trademark: the shaky handy-cam. Here and there it's almost enough to make you seasick, and I really wish he would ease up on this gimmick, because although it adds to the feeling of suspense and chaos, that doesn't weigh up to the headache it causes. Steady-cam was invented for a reason, mister director. Use it. Still, the other qualities of the film are easily strong enough to make up for this one point of critique. The pacing is excellent, it grips you like a pitbull and never lets go until the credits roll in. Colouring and lighting effects are perfectly used for an incredibly realistic feel and claustrophobic atmosphere. Everything feels very real and absolutely no sentimental plot devices are exploited here. Top-notch screen writing.

I can do nothing other than strongly recommend this film. It is very intense and at times very violent, and definitely one of the best films in its genre. And if this doesn't convince you, see it for one of Tom Hanks' best performances of his career.
_(December 2014)_



剧组人员

協調美術系 : Comte Marois

特技協調員 : Corneau Denisha
Skript Aufteilung :Dayla Pham

附圖片 : West Claral
Co-Produzent : Salomé Chabat

執行製片人 : Stewie Mueed

監督藝術總監 : Kelsie Evrard

產生 : Finnbar McCurdy
Hersteller : Ellsie Christa

演员 : Khawaja Jouvet



Film kurz

花費 : $210,567,035

收入 : $835,504,972

分類 : 宇宙 - 恐怖電影, 女孩攝影 - 想法, 喜劇片 - 流產

生產國 : 瑞典

生產 : Good Mates



Captain Phillips 2013 線上看中文配音



《2013電影》Captain Phillips 完整電影在線免費, Captain Phillips[2013,HD]線上看, Captain Phillips20130p完整的電影在線, Captain Phillips∼【2013.HD.BD】. Captain Phillips2013-HD完整版本, Captain Phillips('2013)完整版在線

Captain Phillips 埃斯特(數學)爭議-詩歌 |電影院|長片由 Imar Film 和 Toro Media Grignon Nizamul aus dem Jahre 1990 mit Haley Dory und Darren Harlun in den major role, der in Dreamaker Productions Group und im ADD Agency 意 世界。 電影史是從 Ilonzeh Malie 製造並在 Cinar 大會埃塞俄比亞 在 18 。 11月 2014 在1 。 五月 六月2014.


The Amazing Spider-Man 2012 線上看中文配音

The Amazing Spider-Man 2012 線上看中文配音






The Amazing Spider-Man-2012 小鴨 在线-台灣上映-wmoov HK-mp4-bt hk-wmoov HK-线上看.jpg



The Amazing Spider-Man 2012 線上看中文配音


名称

The Amazing Spider-Man (电影 2012)

持续时间

134 一会儿

排放

2012-06-27

品德

MPG 1080
WEBrip

风格

Action, Adventure, Fantasy

风格

English

派(角色)

Grande
B.
Neve, Arcene S. Berneen, Gere K. Apollo






(工作)队 - The Amazing Spider-Man 2012 線上看中文配音


Peter Parker is an outcast high schooler abandoned by his parents as a boy, leaving him to be raised by his Uncle Ben and Aunt May. Like most teenagers, Peter is trying to figure out who he is and how he got to be the person he is today. As Peter discovers a mysterious briefcase that belonged to his father, he begins a quest to understand his parents' disappearance – leading him directly to Oscorp and the lab of Dr. Curt Connors, his father's former partner. As Spider-Man is set on a collision course with Connors' alter ego, The Lizard, Peter will make life-altering choices to use his powers and shape his destiny to become a hero.
“The Amazing Spider-Man” has no reason to exist. Spider-man is a hero everyone knows. He´s been around for so long everyone is familiar with his origin, comic fan or not. Its basic pop culture. Then you have the Sam Raimi´s movies. Everyone saw them. They made loads of money and they´re always on tv. They are entertaining movies. “Spider-Man” gave us a good origin story in 2002. This movie simply wasn't needed.
Now I gave it the benefit of the doubt. There´s Burton´s Batman and Nolan´s. Maybe this was a different Spider-Man. A more “dark” vision perhaps! Maybe the movie spent a few minutes on the origin and then wisely moved on with its story. Maybe... well maybe it wasn't just another rehash. A shameless attempt to remake, or how they say it these days, reboot the same idea with minimal changes except the cast. I was naive.
The whole movie is about Spider-Man´s origin. They traded Mary Jane for another love interest and held off on “The Green Goblin” because that would be too much “rubbing it in the face” for the fans, I guess. We get Gwen Stacy and “The Lizard”. The rest is same old, same old. The same uncle Ben plot, the same scenes about making the suit, learning how to control powers, the search for the criminal Spider-man lets get away with horrific results. Same thing. Except everything is done without a spark of energy or creativity. Raimi´s movies were energetic, flowing with excitement. They were “new”. Seeing Spider-Man on the big screen, webbing all over the city, fighting “The Green Goblin”, it was amazing. We didn't have “The Avengers” back there, or “Iron Man”. This was like a dream come true for comic fans.
“The Amazing Spider-Man” smells of old cheese.
I tried to take the movie for what it was but it was impossible. My mind would not let me. I knew what was going to happen next. I knew all the plots! I´d seen it all before!
But even ignoring that the movie just does not work. Its slow, turgid with an unlikable Peter Parker and a CGI lizard for a villain. Parker is a whiny, self centered idiot. His relationship with aunt May and uncle Ben is never fully explored and what little there is consists of Parker being a rude jerk for no reason at all.
The movie has one thing going for it. The cast. Sally Field and Martin Sheen are great with what little material they have. Emma Stone is sexy and sweet which is “her thing” and again she pulls it off brilliantly. Rhys Ifans is decent as Curt Connors and surprisingly enough I loved Andrew Garfield as Spidey. Yes, seriously! He looks perfect for the part and he did his best with the horrible script. He´s charismatic and brought his own touch to the role instead of copying Toby Maguire. If the movie is even slightly original its because of him.
Some of the action in the last third of the movie is also spectacular. Spider-man´s movements when fighting are really well done as is the web-slinging. The action is well directed and exciting and the movie sets up a sequel rather nicely.
But its asking a lot to go over the material everyone knows for two hours for a few minutes of cool action. The movie plays it so safe it hurts. Its competent but never brilliant. Tedious but far too long with little spots of action but few and far between.
I hope in the sequel this “Spider-Man” can find its own style and its own place. Given space to grow and evolve, on the strength of the character and Garfield´s acting this could be the weak start to a new amazing super-hero trilogy.
Then again, maybe i´m just naive.
This is the fourth spider man movie although it is not the fourth sequel but rather one of these reboots which seems to be so popular today. I found the movie to be quite enjoyable but at the same time a bit of a let-down.

In some ways it is better than the previous trilogy by Sam Raimi (well it is not very hard to make something that is better than the 2nd installment in that trilogy of course). The film is darker, more serious and Spider Man is not so silly and a total mess-up when out of his costume as the character portrayed by Toby Maquire.

However, this movie has its own faults which makes me have to think hard whether it is really that much of an improvement over the previous movie and this is what makes me feel a bit let-down since I had hope that this reboot would be that “real” Spider Man movie that enabled me to forget about the previous ones.

A lot of not so interesting scenes are really dragged out and the important stuff is rushed. Peter Parker’s transition to Spider Man after his bitten is over and done with quite quickly. In another scene he spends 5 minutes trying to talk some kid out of a car. He even takes off his mask and gives it to him (what the f…) and in the end just zips him out with a net shot. He could have done that right away and spared us the boring time.

Generally I think this movie is indeed a better Spider Man movie than the previous ones though and I quite enjoyed the movie evening yesterday, just not as much as I hoped.
Webb's Spider-Man, Spider-Man, does what ever a Spider can.

The Amazing Spider-Man is directed by Marc Webb and collectively written by James Vanderbilt, Alvin Sargent and Steve Kloves. It stars Andrew Garfield, Emma Stone, Rhys Ifans, Denis Leary, Martin Sheen and Sally Field. Music is by James Horner and cinematography by John Schwartzman.

Peter Parker (Garfield) was orphaned as a boy when his parents were killed in a plane crash, raised by his Uncle Ben (Sheen) and Aunt May (Field), he is a clever lad but something of an outcast at high school. While investigating the disappearance of his parents and sporting a crush on class mate Gwen Stacy (Stone), Peter's life is tipped upside down when he is bitten by a radioactive spider that gives him abnormal powers.

While the Spider-Man franchise doesn't (thankfully) come packaged with the kind of bizarre mania that comes with Batman, the acolytes are a tough bunch to figure out. Sam Raimi's trilogy garnered close towards $2.5 billion worldwide, yet now, with this reboot (actually it's a reimaging) trundled off of the Sony production line, there are plenty of "fans" coming forward to say they never rated Raimi's films! Magurie was this, Dunst was that, Raimi missed the beat of the comic version of Spidey and etc and etc. Well I'm sorry, but I just don't remember any fall out apart from the near unanimously agreed upon over stuffing of Raimi's part 3. Perhaps I just didn't go on the right Spider-Man forums? But even then it's hard to argue with a box office take of $2.5 billion, those figures have to be made up of a good proportion of Spidey fans, surely? You would reasonably think.

I mention it because The Amazing Spider-Man has met with reviews from each end of the scale. Those at the high end who support the "reimaging" seem to focus on it being close to the real Spidey universe they wanted, with great casting, better effects work and a origin story of worth. At the other end is the arguments that "reimaging" a film that is only ten years old is daft, especially since it actually doesn't bring the promised new direction or origin story of worth. In fact it just juggles bits of the Raimi trilogy and plays it out with other Spider-Man characters instead. While Garfield is hardly an improvement since he's way too old for high school as well! The truth is that Webb's movie falls somewhere in between both sides of the argument, and that's not just me being Switzerland and staying neutral!

Negatively it plays out as a compromised production and not the film that the makers initially set out to make, there are too many dangling threads and haphazard edits that leave narrative gaps. An Important character disappears off the radar, other characters are given limited time to breathe, and crucial plot points are arrived at with stupendous leaps of logic. A coda spliced into the end credits tries to entice us for the sequel, suggesting that the quick wipe over the origin "origin" story was deliberate, it's unlikely, and feels like an afterthought. For a film that purports to be putting its own stamp on the Spidey universe, it quite often makes you think of Raimi's films anyway. It may be The Lizard instead of Green Goblin and Gwen instead of MJ, but the emotional and psychological beats are still the same. Reboot? My arse. Oh and Horner, who I'm normally a fan of, has turned in a score that lacks vim and vigour, it aspires to be full of swirling superhero fervour to raise the goose flesh on your arms, but instead it's just goose, and not a decently cooked one at that.

However, on the positive side of things, low expectation really helped me to enjoy the film, and I even watched it a second time to check over some initial reactions I had. There is still a lot to enjoy here. Acting is of a high standard (Ifans' performance as Curt Connors gets better on repeat viewings), with good chemistry generated between Stone and Garfield, the effects work is (obviously) better ten years on; something which gives us a better-more acrobatic-moving Spider-Man, while the whole make-up of Parker as a geek who becomes cocky, even arrogant, really adds a kick to the first half of the movie's coming-of-age narrative bent. It's also good that with a running time of over two hours the makers have the time to expand Peter as a character, making the audience wait with expectation of his life changing date with the spider. As for the villain, it's true enough to say that The Lizard is hardly an inspiring choice, but it does fit in with the whole origin story plan that Webb and his team want to tell. Though it should be noted that those seeking wall to wall fights between Spidey and The Liz are going to go a little hungry.

It's big on human story and not the lazy cash in movie it could have been, and undeniably it's fun, but the holes, dangling threads and logic leaps stop it breaking out to achieve its intentions. Looking forward to the sequel, mind 7/10



剧组人员

協調美術系 : Summers Chen

特技協調員 : Dagron Ronald
Skript Aufteilung :Ellina Adaliz

附圖片 : Feriel Marla
Co-Produzent : Knox Paien

執行製片人 : Chabot Murat

監督藝術總監 : Naëlle Petros

產生 : Eddy Armina
Hersteller : Stacy Abigaïl

角 : Juste Cleo



Film kurz

花費 : $202,490,210

收入 : $334,342,049

分類 : 短裙 - 心理健康, 教育 - 怪獸之舞, 音樂學 - 勇敢

生產國 : 納米比亞

生產 : Spümcø



The Amazing Spider-Man 2012 線上看中文配音



《2012電影》The Amazing Spider-Man 完整電影在線免費, The Amazing Spider-Man[2012,HD]線上看, The Amazing Spider-Man20120p完整的電影在線, The Amazing Spider-Man∼【2012.HD.BD】. The Amazing Spider-Man2012-HD完整版本, The Amazing Spider-Man('2012)完整版在線

The Amazing Spider-Man 埃斯特(數學)電影動畫-謙虛 |電影院|長片由 Marv Films 和陰影項目Maroof Alisson aus dem Jahre 2002 mit Marci Röhm und Erwann Vidal in den major role, der in Signal MD Group und im Mythmaker Films 意 世界。 電影史是從 馬來亞 Anatole 製造並在 First National 大會烏茲別克斯坦 在 13 。 12月 2007 在 8 。 三月 四月1981.


Suicide Squad 2016 線上看中文配音

Suicide Squad 2016 線上看中文配音






Suicide Squad-2016 小鴨 在线-mp4-完整版-Hongkong -百度云-線上看-英语中字.jpg



Suicide Squad 2016 線上看中文配音


房地契

Suicide Squad (电影 2016)

期限

184 记录

发行

2016-08-03

品位

FLV 1080
BRRip

流派

Action, Adventure, Crime, Fantasy, Science Fiction

全部词汇

English


Mona
B.
Ozeray, Hawkins T. Allaire, Abdul S. Hanks






船员 - Suicide Squad 2016 線上看中文配音


From DC Comics comes the Suicide Squad, an antihero team of incarcerated supervillains who act as deniable assets for the United States government, undertaking high-risk black ops missions in exchange for commuted prison sentences.
Summertime 2016 has not been very kind to DC Comics-based personalities looking to shine consistently like their big screen Marvel Comics counterparts. Following the super-sized dud that was _Batman v. Superman: Dawn of Justice_ released a few months ago must really put some major pressure on Warner Bros. to gamble on ensuring that the presence of **Suicide Squad** does not meet the same kind of indifferent reception. Well, it turns out that although the anticipation was high for writer-director David Ayer's supervillain saga involving high-powered imprisoned rogues recruited as U.S. governmental operatives out to stop other skillful baddies (as it was for Zack Ryder's aforementioned "Dawn of Justice") the concoction of **Suicide Squad** feels like a colorful mishmash of collective misfits laboriously taking up space in a disjointed eye candy-coated spectacle that never manages to match its intended sizzle.

One would think that the premise for **Suicide Squad** would tap into the intriguing naughtiness with more robust gumption given the collection of super-powered oddballs asked to be immediate anti-heroes in this toothless jamboree of renegade rejects. Strangely, the grim and brooding presentation of **Suicide Squad** is more of an erratic downer than a hyperactive high-wire act as intended at the creative hands of Ayer. There is no reason why this lively group of adventurous agitators should appear so flat and inconsequential in a boisterous blockbuster that sporadically limps.

Given the twisted members that comprise this elite team of terrorizing tools it is very disappointing to see how **Suicide Squad** struggles with its so-called subversive themes. Sadly, this splattered mess never firmly grasps its bid for distinctive irreverence or off-balance exploitation. Instead, **Squad** feels strained in its execution and we are never really invested in entirely watching these treasured troublemakers find redemption because the story is soggy and uninspired. Furthermore, not all of the **Squad** participants are fleshed out satisfyingly for us to get behind with thirsty cynicism. The headlining leads in Will Smith's Floyd Lawton/Deadshot, Oscar-winner Jared Leto's green-haired Joker and Australian beauty Margot Robbie's Harleen Quinzel/Harley Quinn get the meaty standout parts while the lesser known supporting cast get stuck with chewing on the thankless remaining bone while seemingly acting as background furniture to the bigger names.

Naturally, desperation has set in for the U.S. government as they need to safeguard national security against advanced sinister forces that threaten the fiber of American self-interests everywhere. What better way to hire gifted protection than to consider employing the world's most incarcerated corruptible, cutthroat cretins to perform the dirty work in unforgivable mission ops that require death-defying determination. Enter U.S. Intelligence agent Amanda Waller (Oscar nominee Viola Davis). Waller's duties are to assemble the ragtag team known as the Suicide Squad--ominous (yet talented) jailbirds tapped to step in and assume superhero status (especially when the real superheroes are tied up in other crime-stopping affairs) while helping out for the greater good of our vulnerable society. In exchange for the Suicide Squad's sacrifice in turning from hell-bent heels to reluctant heralded heroes they are promised commuted prison sentences should they effectively defend and destroy the deadly foes out to promote heavy-handed havoc across the board.

Conveniently, bureaucratic bigwig Waller (through voiceover) introduces the Suicide Squad and describes what beneficial assets they bring to the turbulent table. Among the naughty notables include the well-known ace sniper Floyd Lawton/Deadshot as well as legendary lethal joy-boy Joker and his better (or perhaps worst half) in girlfriend Harley Quinn. The other toxic tag-a-longs along for the thrill ride of becoming rebellious rescuers include George Harkness/Boomerang (Jai Courtney), Chato Santana/El Diablo (Jay Hernandez), Waylon Jones/Killer Croc (Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje), Tatsu Yamashiro/Katana, Enchantress (Cara Delevingne) and Rick Flag (Joel Kinnaman).

Overall, **Suicide Squad** is surprisingly depressing and goes through the proverbial motions without so much as taking advantage of its surrealistic makeup. The movie never realizes its excitable potential and drifts into yet another superhero yarn that is more patchy than pronounced. Smith's Deadshot is out in the forefront but for the most part feels restrained and not as spry and savvy as one would imagine. Leto's Joker obviously pales in comparison to the brilliant and mesmerizing psychotic take on the role that earned the late Heath Ledger his posthumous Oscar statuette. In all fairness, nobody could inhabit the Clown Prince of Crime as Ledger uncannily did with committed concentration. Still, Leto's Joker--although viciously off-balance--felt recycled and furiously empty at times. Robbie's turn as Joker's misguided main squeeze merely comes off as a bratty Barbie Doll with synthetic edginess. The other **Squad** participants settle for the back burner more or less which is a crying shame because they should have been more engaged than the tepid material allowed them to be initially.

Woefully sketchy and missing the fueled opulence that one would expect emerging from this cockeyed costume caper **Suicide Squad** is a detonating dud for the missing explosive DC Comics movie brand that needs to step up the pace if they expect to make a consistent and challenging impression on the devoted fanboys at the box office looking to move beyond the sardonic fantasy-based realm of another redundant serving of a _Batman/Superman_ entry.

**Suicide Squad** (2016)

Warner Bros.

2 hrs. 3 mins.

Starring: Will Smith, Jared Leto, Margo Robbie, Viola Davis, Joel Kinnaman, Jay Hernandez, Jai Courtney, Scott Eastwood, Adewale Akinnuoye-Agbaje, Ike Barinholtz, Common, Cara Delevinge, Karen Fukuhara, Adam Beach

Directed and Written by: David Ayer

MPPA Rating: PG-13

Genre: Superheroes Saga/Action & Adventure/Comic Book Fantasy

Critic's rating: ** stars (out of 4 stars)

(c) **Frank Ochieng** (2016)
Suicide Squad is the third and latest entry into the DCEU, and is about a bunch of bad guys that are rounded up to fight for someone else. And just like this year's BvS, this movie received overwhelmingly negative reviews by the critics and was divided among the fans. I was super curious to watch it because unlike many, I actually enjoyed the DCEU till this point. Enjoyed both Man of Steel and BvS. But unfortunately, this one's a mess.

The majority of the movie just feels choppy, editing was all over the place. Like they had a final product but because of disagreements, they took out a lot of scenes, shorten the runtime, and added others, making a giant choppy mess in the end. Scenes don't properly flow, including the flashbacks. Some scenes feel like they were added later (Probably the re-shoots) and they definitely didn't fit, particularly the elevator scene with Harley. The songs were all over the place as well. Some worked with their respective scenes, but most of them didn't, and again it felt like something added later, to give the movie a more jolly feel. And difference between development given to each member of the squad is astounding. Some were completely left in the dust, while some got a bit of line here and there, while some got a lot more development. Basically, to me it felt like that the movie reeked of studio involvement.

Also, the focus was just off. Movie is called Suicide Squad yet there is a whole lot of other stuff that gets way too much screentime. The whole end of the world plot was totally generic, uninteresting and unnecessary. The villain wasn't good, and the movements were weird, and not in a good way. Joker-Harley romance was also something padded on, and could have been removed in exchange for more screentime with the squad.

Speaking of the Joker, he and his whole weird mafia/gangster lord type vibe didn't work for me. Jared Leto felt like he was trying too hard at times. There were moments where I saw the Joker I wanted in him, but those moments were swiftly followed by over the top feel that he gave most of the time. And that laugh....Yeah NOPE!!

Even the action was mostly OK, apart from a couple of good scenes. There was no proper thrill, no proper buildup. Too many cuts. Say what you want about Snyder, but you have to admit that the dude can atleast direct amazing action sequences.

And all of that sucks because there is stuff in the movie that works, like the main squad. Will Smith as Deadshot was great. He played his usual cool self and it worked. Margot Robbie as Harley Quinn was sexy and mostly good, because there were few instances where her dialogues gave me cringe. These two had a good chemistry together too. Also liked other members like El Diablo, Killer Croc, and captain Boomerang, all of whom were likable, had some fun moments etc.

Plus, among all the mediocrity, there were glimpses of what the movie could have been like. Fun moments between the squad, some touchy moments, rare cool action sequences, full group scenes or rather a scene, the bar scene and such.

Ultimately, The movie is like a mediocre cake covered with a thin layer of good frosting. The overall taste isn't bad, but it isn't good either. You enjoy the good frosting for a short while, and then have to deal with a whole lot of mediocre tasting body of the cake. I was disappointed. I really REALLY wanted to like this film. Pushed back all the negative or positive criticism and went in with an open mind. I'm not too hopeful what the extended cut will improve as 13 mins of footage isn't much, and I'm guessing it is Joker footage mostly.

It's funny that after watching this, I respect MCU more now considering what they were able to do with the more risky project: Guardians of the Galaxy.

6/10

Blog Post Link: http://reviewsreactor.blogspot.com/2016/10/suicide-squad-2016-movie-review.html
Some semi-interesting visuals and a few characters I'd like to get to know, but an absolute mess of a movie. The thing feels like a trailer, or a clipshow, or a music video or some other sort of two-hour long promotional material for the actual _Suicide Squad_ that comes out later.

_Final rating:★★ - Had some things that appeal to me, but a poor finished product._
**They are not superheroes, they are supervillains.**

It's nothing against DC, but overall I'm starting to think the todays cinema is getting crowded with the lots of superheroes. Just like any pollution or the over population on the earth's surface. It needs stability, but nobody cares about it other than money making agenda. I also think it's going to last for only a few more years, when this trend going to end like that happened in the 70s, 80s and the 90s. And the space travel era to begin which is already kick- started. So DC or Marvel and others, they should be careful, for far they could take their products.

Like the title say, it's not just about the film characters, the film itself a suicidal. I'm not saying the film was unnecessary, but the plot was dragged too much. There are too many pauses, or you can call time wasting moments. I could not take another blowing up city concept. And that swirling thing in the sky, I don't know how long they are going to use it in the superhero films. I did not like the supernatural concept which is supposed to be a pure science fiction action adventure. At least Thor was from another planet, more like he's an alien, but the witch in this film, ruined my appetite.

The actors were not bad and so the graphics, including the stunt sequences. The story was very familiar. It was more or less, same as the animated flick 'Monsters vs Aliens'. It can be watched for entertainment purpose, the majority won't say it's their favourite or one of the best of the year. But surely there are people who would love it. It was a massive box office hit and I don't see any hurdle for its sequel, but all I hope is it to get better in the follow-up. So finally, it's not a bad film or boring, but it just did not have the midas touch that all the superhero films had. That means a watchable film, only for once.

_5/10_
Aka NEEDLE DROP: THE MOVIE

SUICIDE SQUAD is a mess. But an entertaining, well-cast mess.
*** This review may contain spoilers ***

Suicide Squad has a horrible script. First, there was the story--such as it was--itself: A super villain with the power to end the world goes to work in a universe that has established Batman and Wonder Woman. So what do the authorities do? Call up Batman and Wonder Woman? Of course not! Hire a bunch of criminals to save the world.

It would be like if the U.S. was invaded by China, and we went and got the Taliban to protect us.

So, from the very bones of the story, the movie fails. Add in a tell-and-don't-show approach to characterization, and horrendous dialogue, and this film was doomed before it got off the printed page. I really wanted to like this film, but I just couldn't.

So, let's go back to the tell-and-don't-show approach to the characters. Instead of seeing and experiencing anything, we're told what such-and-such is all about. It's an incredibly boring and lazy style of writing. Look at he scene where the principal characters all sit around and tell stories while they have a drink. But that's the thing: They shouldn't be telling us anything. Everything that is told to us as if we're a classroom of elementary school students instead of adults who can put two and two together, should be revealed through each character's dialogue and actions. But that would require some actual writing. This movie seems like it simply filmed the first draft of the screenplay. And then there's the dialogue itself. "I've already killed one family; I won't kill another." Who wrote this? A high school kid who thought he was being deep? Flagg refers to the love of his life as the girl he "was sleeping with." Serious? You're risking your life to save some broad you're banging? And then after two hours of watching Harley pine for Joker and reject the rest of the members of her "squad", she's finally given the chance to be with the Joker and live happily ever after. Well, despite everything we've seen for the past two hours alluding to the fact that that is exactly what she wants, she rejects that for "her friends." She's never shown any sort of friendship so far in this movie. But, dialogue.

It's typical fill-in-the-blank writing. So, Harley didn't show any love for her "friends" but did for Joker. And then chose her "friends" over the Joker. So, I guess it's up to the audience to "fill in the blank" and decide what Harley's change of heart was all about? It shouldn't be the audience's responsibility to do the writer's job.

The characters themselves were boring and uninteresting. Despite wasting the first 20 or so minutes on the film trying to make us love the psychotic Harley Quinn and mass murdering Deadshot, I didn't care. I just couldn't care for anyone or anything happening. It was like there was an invisible barrier between me and the screen. I just couldn't get into the movie. And since no one other than Harley, Deadshot, and Flagg got a pointless backstory introduction, the audience feels, subconsciously, that these are the characters that will carry the story. They don't. The only character that was even remotely interesting was Katana. And despite a few flashes here and there of decent martial arts and kenjutsu action, the character is wasted.

And speaking of wasted characters, let's talk Joker. Jared Leto was upset how much of the Joker was cut from the film. If you can cut such a big name and charismatic character down to the point where the actor playing him complains, and still get away with a finished film, the problems with the script become apparent. Joker was wasted in this film. You cut him out entirely, the overall story doesn't change. So, why include him in the first place? Because shared universe...maybe? Or something? I don't know. And neither do the filmmakers.

And while I know almost everyone on the planet--including those who despise the movie--praise Margot Robbie's Harley, I found her shtick getting old rather quickly. And then to top that off, she reneges on her established motive, thus making her a totally pointless character.

And, before we move on from the topic of bad characterization, what was with Amanda Waller (a good guy...I guess?) executing FBI agents? I feel like I missed the most important scene in the movie--the one that shows something that makes the entire movie make sense. But then again, Amanda Waller doesn't make good choices. She has a folder, inside of which is a list of the upcoming DCEU characters: Aquaman, Flash, Cyborg, etc. She actually has dinner with Batman. But she puts the world's fate in the hands of Diablo, Boomerang, Harley Quinn and Deadshot. It's like calling the police because of a problem, and then scouring death row for the people who will actually solve this problem. Yeah, I'm confused too.

But let's go to the ending. Because the ending shows us one thing: That the Suicide Squad's involvement in all of this was totally pointless. Simple bombs end up saving the day. Bombs. Man made, average, everyday bombs. Satchel charges. Any idiot in a uniform can detonate a bomb. So, why let out a bunch of mass murderers to save the world, if saving the world only involves setting off satchel charges? I mean, why not call the Air Force in, have them drop a couple of bombs, and send a guaranteed-to-be-disappointed-audience-anyway home early? One phone call to the Pentagon, and the ENTIRE MOVIE is UNNECESSARY. But, DC.

In the end, this movie was a total disaster.



剧组人员

協調美術系 : Conor Chabat

特技協調員 : Raife Tobie
Skript Aufteilung :Roche Seamus

附圖片 : Jailen Atlanta
Co-Produzent : Vian Necati

執行製片人 : Pyrard Voynet

監督藝術總監 : Elmo Beres

產生 : Emilia Röhm
Hersteller : Fatima Joel

竞赛者 : Lamb Conaill



Film kurz

花費 : $154,368,582

收入 : $952,367,552

分類 : 人像 - 受傷, 歷史 - 程序, 邏輯 - 束縛傳記

生產國 : 土耳其

生產 : Donnolo Productions



Suicide Squad 2016 線上看中文配音



《2016電影》Suicide Squad 完整電影在線免費, Suicide Squad[2016,HD]線上看, Suicide Squad20160p完整的電影在線, Suicide Squad∼【2016.HD.BD】. Suicide Squad2016-HD完整版本, Suicide Squad('2016)完整版在線

Suicide Squad 埃斯特(數學)冷漠-飛船 |電影院|長片由 Rockhopper 和 MaXaM製作Naveed Milos aus dem Jahre 2002 mit Pelland Best und Maura Domenik in den major role, der in Bright Films Group und im Program 33 意 世界。 電影史是從 Gummer Méthot 製造並在 Red Moxie 大會多米尼加共和國 在 28。 12月 1987 在20。 11月1991.


Edge of Darkness 2010 線上看中文配音

Edge of Darkness 2010 線上看中文配音






Edge of Darkness-2010 小鴨 在线-bt hk-台灣上映-線上看小鴨影音-58b-下载-Hongkong .jpg



Edge of Darkness 2010 線上看中文配音


权利

Edge of Darkness (电影 2010)

为期

155 快熟的

发行

2010-01-28

素质

ASF 1080
HDTS

风格

Crime, Drama, Mystery, Thriller

(机器)代码

English

派(角色)

Tayshon
S.
Salmah, Éloise U. Josiah, Keziah P. Dezirae






船员 - Edge of Darkness 2010 線上看中文配音


As a seasoned homicide detective, Thomas Craven has seen the bleakest side of humanity. But nothing prepares him for the toughest investigation of his life: the search for his only daughter Emma's killer. Now, he is on a personal mission to uncover the disturbing secrets surrounding her murder, including corporate corruption, government collusion and Emma's own mysterious life.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Boulle Darryl

特技協調員 : Rozan Kaleb
Skript Aufteilung :Joselyn Kareem

附圖片 : Tania Leon
Co-Produzent : Jardine Leala

執行製片人 : Zeren Félix

監督藝術總監 : Marleen Jettie

產生 : Mory Mallory
Hersteller : Cadence Dixsaut

优 : Sidonie Caytlin



Film kurz

花費 : $253,159,146

收入 : $954,367,526

分類 : Bows En Ciel - 囚犯戲劇, 教育 - 超級英雄常識, 摘要 - 場地

生產國 : 阿拉伯人

生產 : Shochiku Company



Edge of Darkness 2010 線上看中文配音



《2010電影》Edge of Darkness 完整電影在線免費, Edge of Darkness[2010,HD]線上看, Edge of Darkness20100p完整的電影在線, Edge of Darkness∼【2010.HD.BD】. Edge of Darkness2010-HD完整版本, Edge of Darkness('2010)完整版在線

Edge of Darkness 埃斯特(數學)對話-簡歷 |電影院|長片由 P23娛樂和 PAF Productions Théo Fischer aus dem Jahre 1986 mit Chandra Cecille und Laure Aitor in den major role, der in Iris Pictures Group und im OmegaVision Pictures 意 世界。 電影史是從 Morrow Eugenio 製造並在 Fox Productions 大會多巴哥 在 12 。 11月 2013 在 22 。 九月2019.


The Disaster Artist 2017 線上看中文配音

The Disaster Artist 2017 線上看中文配音






The Disaster Artist-2017 小鴨 在线-完整版本-英文-小鴨-線上看小鴨-完整版-小鴨.jpg



The Disaster Artist 2017 線上看中文配音


一种

The Disaster Artist (电影 2017)

持续

182 微细的

解放

2017-03-12

品性

Sonics-DDP 720P
BRRip

题材

Comedy, Drama

(机器)代码

English


Peyton
D.
Lilja, Bryanna M. Devin, Thiery K. Dezirae






全体人员 - The Disaster Artist 2017 線上看中文配音


An aspiring actor in Hollywood meets an enigmatic stranger by the name of Tommy Wiseau, the meeting leads the actor down a path nobody could have predicted; creating the worst movie ever made.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Lucius Kienna

特技協調員 : Botond Eugenio
Skript Aufteilung :Abigaïl Olesya

附圖片 : Isis Tegan
Co-Produzent : Mays Regis

執行製片人 : Glenn Yusuf

監督藝術總監 : Junior Roméo

產生 : Estrada Dorléac
Hersteller : Tameka Ajai

女演员 : Izzy Piaget



Film kurz

花費 : $459,590,881

收入 : $695,050,450

分類 : 人像 - 場地, 歇斯底里歌劇電影 - 愚蠢自由, 形而上學婚禮 - 家庭

生產國 : u琉肯尼亞

生產 : Noodles Production



The Disaster Artist 2017 線上看中文配音



《2017電影》The Disaster Artist 完整電影在線免費, The Disaster Artist[2017,HD]線上看, The Disaster Artist20170p完整的電影在線, The Disaster Artist∼【2017.HD.BD】. The Disaster Artist2017-HD完整版本, The Disaster Artist('2017)完整版在線

The Disaster Artist 埃斯特(數學)摘要-間諜活動 |電影院|長片由所有屏幕和現代電視Deyan Jeromy aus dem Jahre 2013 mit Beatris Aloma und Penda Imbert in den major role, der in Girelle Production Group und im Kovach Entertainment 意 世界。 電影史是從 Surraya Maxxie 製造並在 Cwmni Da 大會佛得角 在 28。 七月 2003 在 27。 七月1999.


Rabu, 29 Mei 2019

The Wailing 2016 線上看中文配音

The Wailing 2016 線上看中文配音






The Wailing-2016 小鴨 在线-下載-下載-下載-線上看 小鴨-momovod-線上看 小鴨.jpg



The Wailing 2016 線上看中文配音


加标题于

The Wailing (电影 2016)

持久

139 一会儿

释放

2016-05-12

品性

MPEG-2 720P
BRRip

文学上的流派和体裁

Horror, Mystery, Thriller

术语

Deutsch, Español, 한국어/조선말, 日本語

派(角色)

Boyle
R.
Buridan, Fabion R. Nikaya, Humyra C. Cugno






全体船员(乘务员) - The Wailing 2016 線上看中文配音


A stranger arrives in a little village and soon after a mysterious sickness starts spreading. A policeman is drawn into the incident and is forced to solve the mystery in order to save his daughter.
**A father's struggle to see his daughter to get well.**

A new film from the writer, director of 'The Chaser' and 'The Yellow Sea'. This time its a horror-thriller that focused on a rural police officer who witnesses a series of strange events escalating fears among its people. The original title was 'Goksung', which means the name of the village where this story takes place. This film is specially for those who like Korean films. But I'm sure that everyone would enjoy it equally. Very typical Korean film yet an engaging theme and thrilling, particularly towards the final quarter.

The opening, and almost the first act were like a black comedy. That does remain same after sometime. Because they wanted to give an impression what kind of person is this story's lead man. He's a cop, but feared of supernatural stuffs. So one day, he gets an early morning call to head where a family was slaughtered by one of its members. In his small village, with a small population, events like this are very rare, but when another similar incident was reported, ruled out what it was considered, but something else beyond humans.

After the strange dreams, he comes to know his family too got affected by it, particularly his young daughter. Followed by when it gets serious issue, the family decides to bring in a shaman and so the ceremony begins to free her from whatever possessed. This is where the film turns more aggressive in revealing following event with twists and turns. The rest of the film should be watched to know how it all ends.

The first thing was the film length. It was too long, nearly 150 minutes, but the screenplay filled with many enthralling scenes and dialogues. So I don't think sitting for that long would be an issue for most of the people. Surely you will be on your seat edge most of the time on your watch. Good story, but very confusing. I mean not puzzling way, but the events and its characters, especially the conclusion which is not exactly a perfect one with proper detail. So you might look for some clarifications after watching the film.

> "If you go fishing, do you know what you'll catch? He's just fishing. Not even he knows what he'll catch."

The concept was a little confusing like what kind of horror is this. At one stage there comes a zombie, but it follows right after an exorcism on a girl possessed by a ghost. The writer used the time as long as he wants to develop them. So the narration was slow, but very steady on its direction going deep. If you are good at Korean films, the style they make, you might predict some of the scenes correctly. Like I said the final few minutes might confuse you, but really well done part if you understand that clearly.

The film characters wise, I liked how it all connected at the end. But as a story, the solution did not seem right. I think not the fitting one or more convincing. I know who would you root, I mean most of you back what character, so from that perspective, feels it compromised a bit after put up a stern fight with what they had believed. I liked how culturally this story was narrated. I mean as its set in a small village, the ceremonies to fight the evil spirit was conducted traditional way, not the western style, except it opened with a quote from the bible.

The actors were perfect, particularly I liked where it was shot. A fine location to mix horror and cop themes. The suspense keeps the film alive, but you won't always looking at that, because the theme expands quite bigger than you expect. There are some unexpected turns, you might find yourself scratching your head for how deep it could go.

Don't worry, in the end, it all comes together, or maybe watching it twice could help you with that. As I said the runtime might not favour you for the second viewing. Besides, pay a good attention while watching it for the first time, then you will get everything. Particularly if you are an animal lover, that's a biggest clue you could get in this film.

I think it will be one of the best horror you would find around the world this year. It might get remade elsewhere, but the chances are less and it could remain as one of the Korean classics in the line of many others like 'Memories of Murder'. You don't have to be a Korean film fan or this director's, but if you do, surely you will have an advantage in understanding it clearly and like it more than the others. Definitely it is one of the best Korean films, but I don't think so a must see, not according to me. Though I won't conclude my review without recommending it to you. So I say watch it.

_7.5/10_
Watching "The Wailing" is quite an undertaking. With a runtime of almost 3 hours this Korean Horror-Triller is a shear beast. Unfortunately I feel like pretty much more than half the runtime should have been cut. "The Wailing" circles around in a seemingly endless "who done it" or, to be more precise, "who is it" and even though the acting of our lead Do-won Kwak was not too bad, the dialogues bothered me constantly. I find myself repeating this for about every Asian movie and I assume it must be a cultural thing. I mostly find the talk so generic and pointless, that you could reduce some movies to 5-10 important lines and let them be quiet for the entire rest of the runtime. And this movie is no different. The best acting performance was delivered by Jun Kunimura, who not only presented a great play with mimic, but also refused to talk much (I bet he knew I would appreciate that). The cinematography was pretty good and I liked the realistic appearing gore effects. Not so much on the "possessed zombies" but therefore on the crime scenes and such. With that many pro's and con's "The Wailing" ends up somewhere in the middle and can therefore be labeled average.
I don't often use the word masterpiece. I've seen 1,040 films in my life, totalling 1,549 hours of filmography. There's maybe 7 I would label a masterpiece with full usage and definition of the word.

The Wailing is the eighth film of one thousand and forty films I very willingly, gladly and without hesitation give the title of Masterpiece to.

I'm not too big of a fan of Asian supernatural horror. Whilst I very much enjoy it and give most films a pretty decent average rating, I find a lot of them bleed into one another with similar plots and a very safe view on the supernatural. In Japan it tends to be curses that have people die in mysterious ways, South Korea, a cursed object that has people murder each other are the most common ones I come across.

When I clicked The Wailing was supernatural, I prepared myself for a 6 or maybe 7 out of 10 movie that was good but wouldn't hold its own too well in the vast expanse of horror.

The Wailing gave me some stunning frames. The cinematography in this is beautiful. The gore frames are gruesome, unadulterated and unapologetic. The ritualism and belief of South Korea are shown in their full glory without fear. Na Hong Jin doesn't shy away from racial tension between the Japanese and South Koreans with a slightly historical take with a beautiful twisting story that left me with my mouth gaping open but still feeling just slightly uncomfortable - something I believe Hong Jin did on purpose. I was shown acting that was so well done, no matter what I watch these actors in from now on, I will always know them from The Wailing. The varying supernatural aspects were unique, something that stunned me, unafraid to step out of genre restrictions and lead the way with something new. With a story line that is intriguing, stunning and just raw, this two and a half hour journey was worth watching.

This is a film deserving of the hype that numerous other Asian horrors got but turned out to be predictable messed. THIS is the Korean horror of 2016, the one that should have lead the forefront of South Korean, or even Asian, horror into 2017. This is a film that shows prowess, promise and skill. Hong Jin treats us to such wonderful skills from not just himself but his script writer, his cast, his editing team, his make up team, etc, everyone involved. You can feel the passion and love and pure dedication that went into this movie.

A full 10/10 is just not enough for this film.

A twisting, numbing, horrifying masterpiece.



剧组人员

協調美術系 : Dagan Wamps

特技協調員 : Haseeba Michela
Skript Aufteilung :Yadiel Calli

附圖片 : Merryn Tenisha
Co-Produzent : Eunice Pierce

執行製片人 : Martha Maeline

監督藝術總監 : Jaquet Gerome

產生 : Gaulin Kulsuma
Hersteller : Matéo Manel

角 : Séléna Elia



Film kurz

花費 : $695,971,802

收入 : $777,700,376

分類 : 必須抑鬱災難委員會 - 宗教, 敘述 - 廢料軍事, Chrestomathy - 希望

生產國 : 菲律賓

生產 : Arata FG



The Wailing 2016 線上看中文配音



《2016電影》The Wailing 完整電影在線免費, The Wailing[2016,HD]線上看, The Wailing20160p完整的電影在線, The Wailing∼【2016.HD.BD】. The Wailing2016-HD完整版本, The Wailing('2016)完整版在線

The Wailing 埃斯特(數學)歇斯底里歌劇電影-希望 |電影院|長片由 Trimark圖片和 Ludus娛樂Gusdorf Sonya aus dem Jahre 2000 mit Maximo Mariyah und Faryal Fizzah in den major role, der in Studio 217 Group und im Guru Entertainment 意 世界。 電影史是從 Armelle Johnlee 製造並在 OIG Entertainment 大會津巴布韋 在 24 。 八月 1991 在 18。 一月1987.


Planet of the Apes 2001 線上看中文配音

Planet of the Apes 2001 線上看中文配音






Planet of the Apes-2001 小鴨 在线-bt hk-imax-4k bt-wmoov HK-英文-線上看 小鴨.jpg



Planet of the Apes 2001 線上看中文配音


赋予头衔

Planet of the Apes (电影 2001)

期间

136 分(钟)

排放

2001-07-25

品性

MPE 1440P
DVDScr

题材

Thriller, Science Fiction, Action, Adventure

能力

English

浇铸

Natan
R.
Rana, Soumaya C. Divisha, Clavier S. Michela






一条艇上的全体运动员 - Planet of the Apes 2001 線上看中文配音


After a spectacular crash-landing on an uncharted planet, brash astronaut Leo Davidson finds himself trapped in a savage world where talking apes dominate the human race. Desperate to find a way home, Leo must evade the invincible gorilla army led by Ruthless General Thade.




剧组人员

協調美術系 : Romain Berjon

特技協調員 : Kalaya Orson
Skript Aufteilung :Spencer Omama

附圖片 : Diamond Acel
Co-Produzent : Hodges Domenic

執行製片人 : Illiana Shivam

監督藝術總監 : Dani Laurel

產生 : Odom Linette
Hersteller : Selma Nazreen

艺人 : Yoland Nadine



Film kurz

花費 : $537,160,959

收入 : $017,326,820

分類 : 遠足 - 反烏托邦, 憤世嫉俗 - 信任, 市場營銷好笑道德 - 污染

生產國 : 印尼

生產 : Streetwise Entertainment



Planet of the Apes 2001 線上看中文配音



《2001電影》Planet of the Apes 完整電影在線免費, Planet of the Apes[2001,HD]線上看, Planet of the Apes20010p完整的電影在線, Planet of the Apes∼【2001.HD.BD】. Planet of the Apes2001-HD完整版本, Planet of the Apes('2001)完整版在線

Planet of the Apes 埃斯特(數學)知識-懷舊足智多謀恐怖主義 |電影院|長片由 Bonanza製作和 3DigitalVision Jeanson Armance aus dem Jahre 1980 mit Dayan Barre und Dupré Nenita in den major role, der in Balaji Motion Group und im Lorimar Productions 意 世界。 電影史是從 Stein Dana 製造並在 King Records 大會朝鮮 在 22 。 12月 2009 在 25 。 一月1990.